Re: Updates to Issue-201 Change Proposal per our conversation

Hi Frank,

You wrote:

> Steve's proposed text below looks reasonable; I believe this addition
> sufficiently explains the correct usage for authors.

I assume this is the change we're supposed to review:

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/index.php?title=User%3AEoconnor%2FISSUE-201&diff=13295&oldid=13278

If so, it looks fine to me.


Ted

Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 16:20:20 UTC