On 11/17/2011 05:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:27:12 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> > wrote: >> I could have chosen to close this issue by amicable consent last week: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Nov/0016.html >> >> Instead, I am asking to see if there is anybody actively working on a >> new proposal, and if so, what is the expected timeframe for that >> proposal to be complete? >> >> Whether fullscreen is new information enough isn't the right question. >> The right question is: is somebody working on a proposal? If not, we >> should simply declare consensus and move on. If so, all I ask is that >> they let us know. > > And what we are saying, is that from the only proposal on the table, the > exact rendering is still to be determined. I read that as you have no objections to the current proposal, and that you are asserting that the "new information" that you cited does not affect the proposal. > And asking the editor to put > in the rendering rules from that proposal is thus counter productive. Nobody is doing that. - Sam RubyReceived on Thursday, 17 November 2011 11:38:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:45 UTC