- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:27:12 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 11/16/2011 04:45 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:50:31 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> > wrote: >> Just to clarify: if we adopt the decision, we would require new >> information to reopen it. > > Isn't fullscreen new information enough to at least allow modification > to the proposal to make the exact rendering TBD? I have not heard of a > single person that does not want <dialog> thus far and it seems all you > are doing is making it hard to do the right thing here. Or at least > making it seem hard. I could have chosen to close this issue by amicable consent last week: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Nov/0016.html Instead, I am asking to see if there is anybody actively working on a new proposal, and if so, what is the expected timeframe for that proposal to be complete? Whether fullscreen is new information enough isn't the right question. The right question is: is somebody working on a proposal? If not, we should simply declare consensus and move on. If so, all I ask is that they let us know. - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 22:27:47 UTC