- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:33:03 -0500
- To: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Steve Faulkner <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, html4all <list@html4all.org>, w3c-wai-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Hi Josh, >>> FWIW, before *any* further solution is engineered @longdesc should be >>> conforming and valid and a first class citizen in HTML 5. >> >> So are you saying that we should stick with Chaals original spec text? >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/index.php?title=ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc&oldid=10104#Main_Spec_Changes: > > I could certainly live with that. Could you live with http://www.d.umn.edu/~lcarlson/research/ld-spec-text.html or http://www.html5accessibility.com/tests/img-longdesc.html or some combination of those two? Thanks. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 23:34:39 UTC