- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, PSIG <member-psig@w3.org>
On 22.03.2011 17:07, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Dailey, David P. wrote: >> >> When these issues were discussed in 2009, I was of the opinion [1], as I >> gather Larry Rosen has said that the consensus of the Working Group was >> that forking of the spec was not desirable. > > This is incorrect. It is possibly the majority opinion of the AC > representatives of company members of the W3C that forking should not be > allowed, but it is not the consensus opinion of the HTML working group. In > fact, two of the use cases the working group presented to the W3C are > explicitly about forking. A solution that disallows forking wouldn't be > one that addresses the requests of the group. ...for the record: I don't believe there *is* a consensus opinion of the HTML WG. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 16:16:25 UTC