Doug Jones writes: > - Any work describing a change to how something in the W3C HTML5 > specification is to behave (like adding an attribute to an element) > by changing only that part of the wording and > -- republishing the work as the W3C HTML5 *or* the HTML5 > specification is *not* permitted. > -- publishing it as a separate document not claiming to be a > technical specification is OK, although not authorized. > -- publishing it as a separate document *and* claiming to be a > technical specification and not including or implying 'HTML' or > 'W3C' in the title is OK, although not authorized. Hi. I'm still struggling to follow this. What's the difference between 'OK' and 'authorized'? Surely I am either permitted to do something with the spec text or I am not -- I don't understand what the third category is. Thanks. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 12:28:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:33 UTC