W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

Re: ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 01:14:49 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTin4KvEzA6OeWZWyA2nKAmNhgFVi=nAXv8YqC=mF@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Thanks for the clarification.

On 3 March 2011 19:45, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 06:36 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:
>> 's/support/vehement support'
> At first I thought this was a joke and thought I would let it pass, but now
> it is apparent that it is a genuine misunderstanding:
> http://twitter.com/danja/status/43246636461338624
> To be clear: saying you support something is not an objection.  Saying that
> you vehemently support something doesn't make it an objection.
> At some point in the future there will likely be a survey on this issue.  At
> that point you will be presented with the opportunity to state your
> objections to either proposal.  Statements at such time indicating support
> for a proposal will be ignored.  What we will be looking for is objections.
>  There will be no need to contribute to the survey if you feel that your
> objection has already been adequately expressed by others, either on the
> survey or in the change proposal you support.  But if you have anything to
> add that you don't feel has been adequately expressed by either already,
> that would be the time to do so.  If you are not sure, go ahead and express
> it anyway as long as it is your own words and not merely repeating
> sentiments that were already expressed.
> I hope this helps.


Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 00:15:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:33 UTC