- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:03:12 -0500
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 03/02/2011 02:53 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:31:23 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> > wrote: > >> ISSUE-126: charset-vs-quotes - Straw Poll for Objections >> >> The poll is available here and it will run through Thursday Mar 10th: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-126-objection-poll/ >> >> Please read the introductory text before entering your response. >> >> In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only >> need to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is >> truly strong, and has not been adequately addressed by a clearly >> marked objection contained within a Change Proposal or by someone >> else's objection. The Chairs will be looking at strength of >> objections, and will not be counting votes. > > The description and link to > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0300.html> for > Julian's CP seems to be copy-pasted from ISSUE-125, is this a mistake or > have the issues been merged? The descriptions are similar (suggestions welcome!). The link was incorrect. It has now been corrected. The correct link is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Nov/0234.html Thanks for reporting this! - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 20:03:44 UTC