- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:31:25 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 02/28/2011 02:58 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 27.02.2011 17:17, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On 02/26/2011 02:08 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>>> >>>> If ISSUE-125 depends on the outcome of ISSUE-126 then they should have >>>> been considered together, but that's up to you and the chairs. As >>>> things >>>> stand, if just your CP for ISSUE-125 is accepted then the resulting >>>> algorithm will not 'parse quotes in Content-Type headers in "meta" >>>> elements in a HTTP compliant manner', and so the willful violation >>>> cannot be removed. >>> >>> Well, they have been raised together. The timing of the polls is >>> something outside my control. >> >> We previously had been evaluating your request to park issue 126 until >> issue 125 has been resolved[1]. As this no longer appears to be your >> wishes, I will see to it that a poll for issue 126 is issued early this >> week. > > For simplicity, can we wait until the change for 126 is in, and then > maybe run 126 and 148 in parallel? A survey has now been issued for issue 126, to be completed on March 10th: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-126-objection-poll/ A this time, we will extend the survey for issue 125 to match the end date for this survey: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-126-objection-poll/ The deadline for counter-proposals for issue 148 remains March 10th: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0198.html > Best regards, Julian - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 17:31:58 UTC