On 03/01/2011 06:37 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > Hi sam,thank you for the clarification: > > In regards to hgroup and headings it may contain, the spec is > conradictory, so until that is resolved I would suggest implementors > refrain from implementing it. You are welcome to make that suggestion to implementers. > This may well become a moot point if hgroup is modified or removed > during last call. Agreed. > >While I haven't carefully double checked this list, it does match my > recollection. > > it would be good to get confirmation from the chairs on what needs to be > changed. I believe that the decision is clear and that your summary is accurate. In the unlikely event of a conflict, the decision takes precedence. > regards > stevef - Sam RubyReceived on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 12:11:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:33 UTC