- From: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:17:32 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
Paul Cotton wrote: >> If no objections are raised to this call by July 12th 2011, we will >> direct the editor to make the proposed change. > > At this time, we find that we have consensus on the following proposal > for ISSUE-150: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0120.html Personally, I don't have any opinion on how code points should be mentioned in the spec. I find both the current method and the proposed method to be fine, hence my lack of objection by the deadline above. But I don't recall any other implementors stating a strong opinion either. Given that everyone seems to be implementing things just fine with the spec as is, I'm struggling to come up with a compelling reason for this working group to direct the editor to make such a large edit to the spec over such a purely editorial matter. I think we should leave this to the editor's discretion. Ted
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 17:18:09 UTC