- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:29:28 +0200
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 2011-07-07 03:33, Tantek Çelik wrote: >> Maciej, >> >> thanks for repeating this. > > Maciej, thanks for providing a URL and succinct specific quotes. As far as I can tell, Maciej just repeated what I told you two weeks ago. But anyway. >> Tantek, what's the next step now? I'm really trying to understand how the >> registry is supposed to work. > > This is the first time we've had to deal with rel values that were > implicitly obsoleted by being dropped from one version of a > specification to another, yet were explicitly stated as ok to > register. Not true. You've been reading something into the decision that never was there. There was no "obsoletion" whatsoever. > Lacking any explicit process for handling this case, I've gone ahead > and documented such rel values in a new table [1] > > [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values#dropped_without_prejudice > > with the straw proposal that any such values are registrable similar > to new values that have never been specified which I believe reflects > the intent behind the cited WG decision URL and quotes. Feel free to > suggest an alternative on the microformats-discuss mailing list, or > any improvements you think would be more acceptable to the working > group. > ... Thanks. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2011 07:29:57 UTC