- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:43:30 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 01/24/2011 08:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Summary: Remove or change the note after "algorithm for extracting an > encoding from a Content-Type" to not mention HTTP as HTTP is not > affected by this algorithm. > > Rationale: "algorithm for extracting an encoding from a Content-Type" is > only used to examine the contents of a document and therefore does not > affect HTTP. Claiming it a willful violation of HTTP is misleading. > > Details: Remove the note or the alter the wording to make it clear this > is not a willful violation of HTTP. I request that you either pick one, or submit both as two separate change proposals. In either case, I request that you supply more details so that this proposal / these proposals can be applied without ambiguity. This information needs to not only be sufficient for the editor, but also sufficient for anybody in the working group who may wish to comment on this proposal should it go to survey. > Impact: I wanted to write a joke here, but saying impact to the status > quo is non-existent is probably better. - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 15:44:02 UTC