- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:45:54 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 01/24/2011 07:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:25:02 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 24.01.2011 13:17, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> The HTTP syntax. It cuts both ways. If clients are not compatible with >>> IE, the HTTP syntax is not compatible with them either. And as you >>> indicated yourself it is not clear that IE is fully conforming to it >>> anyway. (Please note that this and below are a side argument from the >>> above. The above is about <meta> which does not need to adhere to the >>> HTTP syntax.) >> >> I don't see how the syntax "breaks" any clients. > > If, as you say, changing the syntax breaks IE, then keeping the syntax > breaks Opera/Chrome/Firefox/Safari. Are we likely to see any further concrete proposals as a result of this discussion? - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 12:46:28 UTC