Re: ISSUE-151 (whatwg-references): Chairs Solicit Proposals

On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:55:00 +0100, Sam Ruby <>  

> 'Remove WhatWG and references in status section of document'
> Per the decision policy, at this time the chairs would like to solicit
> volunteers to write Change Proposals.
> If no Change Proposals are written by February 6th, 2011 this issue
> will be closed without prejudice.
> Issue status link:

Edit at will. I'll revert at will.

Why are editorial and trivial issues like this, ISSUE-145 and ISSUE-139  
allowed to reach this stage of the decision process and waste the time of  
this WG? Why can't the chairs evaluate the issue and take a decision in  
simple cases? Even the wrong decision is better than going through the  
Process for ISSUEs that don't have any real-world impact.

Philip Jägenstedt
Core Developer
Opera Software

Received on Saturday, 22 January 2011 22:40:41 UTC