- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:55:09 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 02/28/2011 04:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > The point that is being made here is that your CP introduces the problem > anew in HTML. If the chairs adopt the proposal as written, I would expect > to subsequently file bugs to fix the proposal to actually be well-defined > again. (Since I do not think that the proposal is an improvement to the > Web, however, I have not spent the time to work out how one would go about > doing that yet.) Does Philip's stated objection sufficiently cover this point? - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 21:55:40 UTC