Re: Request to reopen HTML-ISSUE-30

On 02/23/2011 02:09 PM, Laura Carlson wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
>> The chairs have discussed this and the only delay is that there is no
>> clear identification of what is the new information[1] in this request.
>
> I added a "New Information" section. Is that what you mean?

You certainly are thorough, not to mention quick.  Kudos.

I haven't reviewed all of this section, but I will say that the 
following subsection is in the spirit of what we are looking for:

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc#New_Formal_Use_Cases_Requiring_longdesc

> Best Regards,
> Laura

- Sam Ruby

> On 2/23/11, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net>  wrote:
>> On 02/21/2011 07:43 PM, Laura Carlson wrote:
>>> Dear Chairs,
>>>
>>> Please consider re-opening ISSUE 30. New information has been gathered
>>> and a change proposal has been developed.
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc
>>
>> The chairs have discussed this and the only delay is that there is no
>> clear identification of what is the new information[1] in this request.
>>    If you or others could provide this, that would speed up the process;
>> otherwise the chairs will get to it in due course.
>>
>> Concurrently, we are working on Bug 11447[2] in order to clarify this
>> requirement.
>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Laura Carlson<laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
>>> Gregory J. Rosmaita<oedipus@hicom.net>
>>> John Foliot<jfoliot@stanford.edu>
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGChairReopen
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11447
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 19:25:31 UTC