- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:24:16 -0500
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 02/10/2011 06:49 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> On 02/05/2011 05:33 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> >>> On 05.02.2011 02:31, Ian Hickson wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> I think it is a separate issue. As such, I've filed a bug for Philip: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11984 >>>> >>>> Ok, fixed. >>>> ... >>> >>> I disagree with this resolution, and therefor ask the chairs to instruct >>> the editor to revert the changes. >>> >>> To those who didn't follow before: this introduces media type sniffing >>> for<video>. >> >> At this point, the chairs are asking the WG if anyone else wants to see this >> reverted. If you have a technical (i.e., non-procedural) objection to the >> approach taken by the resolution to this bug, we are asking you to indicate >> such by adding a brief comment to bug itself. > > Should people that support this change also voice their support? It > seems hard to gauge if the change increased or decreased consensus > otherwise. (I don't have enough data to have a strong opinion on this, > but I would imagine other people at mozilla might). At this point, we are soliciting objections. Based on the responses (or lack thereof) that we receive we may make additional requests. > / Jonas - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 00:24:49 UTC