- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:54:32 -0500
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 02/05/2011 05:33 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 05.02.2011 02:31, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> ...
>>> I think it is a separate issue. As such, I've filed a bug for Philip:
>>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11984
>>
>> Ok, fixed.
>> ...
>
> I disagree with this resolution, and therefor ask the chairs to instruct
> the editor to revert the changes.
>
> To those who didn't follow before: this introduces media type sniffing
> for <video>.
At this point, the chairs are asking the WG if anyone else wants to see
this reverted. If you have a technical (i.e., non-procedural) objection
to the approach taken by the resolution to this bug, we are asking you
to indicate such by adding a brief comment to bug itself.
Possible outcomes include:
*) the editor voluntarily agreeing to revert the change and REOPEN the
bug based on the technical feedback.
*) the chairs determining that this change is controversial and likely
to reduce rather than increase consensus and/or that the change
represents a new features that should not be added after the cutoff
as it doesn't meet the bar of "particularly exceptional
circumstances".
*) neither the editor nor the chairs taking action on this bug at this
time; in which case we will likely need to reassess impact of this
change on issue-145.
If you do have input to provide, we would appreciate it being given
before the time of next week's telecon, as this will be a topic of
discussion to be covered in the "Other Business" item on the agenda.
- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 20:55:02 UTC