- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:39:00 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 02/04/2011 10:20 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 04.02.2011 16:08, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> ... >> Right, this is exactly my problem. Not everyone likes the status quo, >> but you oppose radically changing the status quo in favor of a more >> minor change and only allow voting on the minor change. The "consensus" >> might end up being that minor change or no change. And then of course a >> radical change introduced later will undermine that "consensus", except >> consensus was never there to begin with. > > ... Anne, you previously agreed to this process. If you have a problem with the process itself, I encourage you to write up a bug report. > I do not oppose at all. All I'm saying is that if you want a radical > change, you should raise a bug for that change. +1 I previously stated such[1]. Maciej has stated that informally he agrees[2]. At the present time, it seems highly likely that we will not entertain the NoVideoContentType content type proposal at this time. If a bug is filed and the resolution of that bug is not satisfactory this could lead to a Last Call issue and ultimately to decision. I see zero reason to halt progress on this issue speculatively because of something that might or might not happen at some point in the future. > BR, Julian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0415.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/02/03-html-wg-minutes.html
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 15:39:33 UTC