Re: ISSUE-145 codecs-vs-octet - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:08:45 +0100, Julian Reschke <>  
> On 04.02.2011 11:32, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> endorses that or endorses your proposal having a later issue remove all
>> that text seems disingenuous.
> Not necessarily, if the WG decides that.

What if the editor simply agrees with him?

> What I have trouble with is the situation where a bug asks for an  
> editorial clarification and is hijacked to remove a certain aspect of  
> the spec altogether.
> I have no problem with discussing this, and the WG deciding on it, but I  
> believe piggybacking it on issue 145 is problematic.

It seems easier to me than the alternative.

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 14:54:57 UTC