Re: request to re-open issue 133 due to submission of a change prposal.

hi sam,

what you cited says


- Jan 22, 2010 - cutoff for escalating bugs for pre-LC consideration -
all issues in tracker, calls for proposal issued by this date
Consequences of missing this date: any further escalations will be
treated as a Last Call comment.


this was not an escalation, it was already a bug that had been escalated, it
was already an issue, a call for proposals had already been issued.

the timeline says:


Feb 23, 2011 - every issue has at least one Change Proposal
Consequences of missing this date: issues will be closed without
prejudice and marked POSTPONED; can be reconsidered during LC or for a
later version of HTML.

the issue has one change proposal.

it would be good if the chairs followed their own rules.

regards
Stevef

On 1 February 2011 21:57, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 02/01/2011 04:28 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
>> Can the chairs please explain why it has not been re-opened as a pre
>> last call issue when it was filed prior to the cutoff and closed without
>> prejudice due to lack of change proposal.
>>
>
> All escalations after Jan 22, 2011 will be treated as a Last Call comment:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0074.html
>
> - Sam Ruby
>



-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html

Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:20:19 UTC