- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:18:04 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
There are two new Editors Drafts for RDFa Lite 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1. RDFa Lite 1.1 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-lite/ HTML+RDFa 1.1 http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/ Changes for RDFa Lite 1.1: * Cleaned up the conformance section to make normative statements about what constitutes an RDFa Lite 1.1 Document. This establishes RDFa Lite as a REC track document. * Removed processor conformance and user agent conformance sections since RDFa Lite is about a subset of RDFa syntax. Processor conformance and user agent conformance is defined in RDFa Core and the Host Language documents. * Removed the dependency on the HTML5 spec so that RDFa Lite can be applied to other Host Languages while simultaneously making HTML5+RDFa depend on the RDFa Lite spec. Changes for HTML+RDFa 1.1: * Created a dependency to the RDFa Lite specification so that there are clear document conformance rules for HTML+RDFa 1.1 and HTML+RDFa Lite 1.1 * Added language to allow LINK and META elements in the body of a document if they contain RDFa attributes. This is to bring HTML+RDFa in line with the HTML Data Task Force's desire to have META and LINK allowed in the body (which Microdata also allows). * Added support for the @datetime and @value attributes. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2011 16:18:43 UTC