On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>wrote: > We'd prefer this issue resolved now rather than later. I've gone ahead and > written the change proposal (it seemed like the easiest way to give a > detailed answer your questions). Included in it is an in depth explanation > of: > > * Our implementation details > * Example real world scenarios for the keyword > * Customer requests for the keyword > * Other implementers that are implementing our proposal > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/sandbox_allow_popups > > I'm happy to retract the escalation if we can make the change by amicable > resolution. > I am happy to apply the above proposal (indeed I reopened the bug recently because we now have two implementations, and the reason I had marked the bug LATER was lack of implementation experience). It would be good if it could be made clear that I would still be able to fix up minor details later. In particular, this part of the spec is likely to need refactoring soon to make it easier to reference from the CSP specification. Purely an editorial matter, but it would likely involve changing the wording for all the keywords, including 'allow-popups'. The black-box normative aspects wouldn't be affected. -- Ian Hickson
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 01:43:21 UTC