W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2010

Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:16:48 +0200
Message-ID: <4BF695D0.2060504@gmx.de>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 20.05.2010 20:58, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Issue 89 Counter Proposal
> =========================
> ...

I agree that working on these kind of guidelines is useful. I also agree 
that it's ok to do in the this Working Group, it sufficient interest is 

On the other hand, I disagree that the language spec is the right place 
to do it. Even if it wasn't too big already (which it is), separating 
the normative spec from authoring advice seems to be the better 
approach; in particular it allows documents to be published and 
progressed independently.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 21 May 2010 14:17:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:19 UTC