- From: ddailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 20:30:13 -0400
- To: <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 21 May 2010 00:32:50 UTC
I haven't been following this thread much of late and am frankly not sure of its current disposition. But the following news article: http://www.informationweek.com/news/infrastructure/traffic_management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224900400&cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All dated May 19, 2010 makes me think that some of our earlier suggestions that someone could just "make" a new video codec that steers clear of both patent and cost concerns may have been taken to heart? am I missing something? David
Received on Friday, 21 May 2010 00:32:50 UTC