- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:13:39 -0400
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 05/19/2010 05:47 AM, Smylers wrote: > Daniel Glazman writes: > >> Le 19/05/10 10:56, Henri Sivonen a écrit : >> >>> String that look like processing instructions (including<?php ... ?> >>> ) are non-conforming in text/html and don't cause PI DOM nodes to be >>> created in text/html. Thus, the polyglot guide would have wrong if >>> it didn't say that PIs don't belong in the polyglot subset. >>> >>> As for<?php ... ?> being bogus in text/html in the first place, the >>> HTML5 spec deals with what travels over the public network, so >>> server-side pre-processor syntaxes are out of scope. Thus editing >>> environments that want to preserve pre-processor syntax can't even >>> follow the HTML5 spec proper when it comes to that syntax. >> >> Henri... Nobody's editing html with php inside through a http pipe. >> It's local storage > > Quite. So that's out of jurisdiction of any HTML spec. Looking at the charter[1], I don't see how you came to that conclusion. - Sam Ruby [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/05/html/charter
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:14:13 UTC