W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2010

Re: change proposal for issue-86, was: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:58:50 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikrziCP73Z-Fjhtr8KunZ8rV7tMxnnaid4x_1e3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 16.04.2010 10:30, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2010, at 7:04 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>>> On 08.04.2010 20:12, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Since a number of people have expressed interest, I think it would be
>>>> helpful to provide a second proposal along these lines.
>>>
>>> Sure. Here it is:
>>
>> Recorded here now:
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-086
>> ...
>
> It doesn't seem any new arguments are presented anymore. Can we please
> proceed to either a call for counter proposals, or to a call for consensus?

I drop my objection.  I've never used Atom myself, and I don't have
the bandwidth to really dive into whatever issues are left with Atom.

~TJ
Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 19:59:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:02 UTC