- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 15:27:07 -0700
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > The poll is available here, and will run starting today, and run through Wednesday, May 19th. > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-90-objection-poll/ > > Please read the introductory text before entering your response. > > In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only need to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly strong, and has not been adequately addressed by a Change Proposal or someone else's objection. The Chairs will be looking at strength of objections, and will not be counting votes. I'm somewhat confused as to what the rules are. Should people that agree with either of the two change proposals not say anything? Since that would be "feel[ing] that your objection has already been adequately addressed by someone else." What about the writers of either change proposal? They wouldn't be agreeing with "someone else" but rather with themselves. In the event that everyone in the group agrees with either of the two proposals, does that mean that the chairs will just judge the contents of the change proposals and nothing else? FWIW, i don't at this time have a strong opinion on any of the questsion. Just trying to understand what to do. / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 22:27:59 UTC