- From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 07:03:42 +0000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com)" <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
If that is the end of the development of SRT by the HTMLWG, yes. -----Original Message----- From: Sam Ruby [mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 4:40 AM To: Sean Hayes Cc: Ian Hickson; Paul Cotton; Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com); public-html@w3.org; Chris Lilley Subject: Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks On 05/07/2010 05:52 AM, Sean Hayes wrote: > > I respectfully ask that the chairs and the Hypertext Coordination > Group clarify whether they think developing a timed track format is in > scope for HTML or whether it more properly falls in the remit of the > Timed Text WG, the SYMM WG (or both) to further work on a suitable > timed text format based on SRT, should that be deemed necessary. With Ian's removal[1] of WebSRT from the editor's draft, I assume that this question is now moot. - Sam Ruby [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010May/0197.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 07:04:22 UTC