- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 13:05:31 +0200
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, www-international@w3.org
On 07.05.2010 11:34, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > On 2010-05-05 20:22, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >> Let multiple language tags continue to be legal. >> (http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ContentLanguages) > > This is a response to the arguments put forth in both that change > proposal, the the change proposal from the i18n WG. Both proposals > present similarly flawed arguments, and so I will refute them together. > > http://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Htmlissue88 > > For this issue, we have 3 options presented: > > 1. Make Content-Language non-conforming. > 2. Leave Content-Language as Obsolete but Conforming, permitting only a > single language tag. (Current spec) > 3. Leave Content-Language as Obsolete but Conforming, permitting a comma > separated list of language tags. > ... Another alternative is to leave it alone (it's conformant in HTML4, isn't it?). Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 7 May 2010 11:06:15 UTC