- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 16:28:39 -0700
- To: Sean Hayes <sean.hayes@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On May 6, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Sean Hayes wrote: >>> TTML most recently went to CR in February of this year, first went >>> to CR in 2006, and went FPWD in 2004. At which of those dates was >>> XSL:FO ahead? > All of them. None of the features we wanted from CSS3 are at more > than CR stage even now and many are still WD. 1) What XSL:FO features does TTML rely on that CSS can't do? 2) If there are such features, doesn't that prove the point that implementing TTML requires a separate text layout engine that does XSL:FO semantics? Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 23:29:13 UTC