W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2010

Re: HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:50:19 +0200
To: "Andrei Popescu" <andreip@google.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vggd1pka64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:21:29 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>  
> wrote:
>> But I am not sure I understand what prevents you from doing both. You
>> can render your two buttons for the existing millions of pages. If
>> some new pages do specify the capture parameter, you can just hide the
>> irrelevant button. What is the drawback to that?
> That could be an ok solution I agree.

It seems better to me to start out simple first. Like Jonas I'm not too  
convinced the capture parameter is really justified.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 13:51:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:21 UTC