- From: Simpson, Grant Leyton <glsimpso@indiana.edu>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:36:06 +0000
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
I realize that it's late in the game now that a straw poll has gone out, but is it possible to have a new change proposal that charts a middle path between the ISO option and the ECMA option? Something to the effect of having the reference to the ANSI/ISO spec but providing an option to UA developers of using the ECMA spec due to its better availability (provided, of course, they are actually identical -- I have not compared them myself). Best, Grant Simpson On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > The poll is available here, and it will run through Friday, July 30th: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-101-objection-poll/ > > Please read the introductory text before entering your response. > > In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only need to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly strong, and has not been adequately addressed by a clearly marked objection contained within a Change Proposal or by someone else's objection. The Chairs will be looking at strength of objections, and will not be counting votes. > > Regards, > Maciej Stachowiak > >
Received on Thursday, 22 July 2010 12:38:34 UTC