Re: comments on 'private use' section of proposal - Sanity check

On 19 Jul 2010, at 08:29, Steven Faulkner wrote:
> But unless the tool allows me to add an alternative text (and this may be a simple as being able to edit the source html), the only conforming documents with an image i can produce are those that are meant for people who are known to be able to view and understand the content of the image.

That's true. :) Given we want tools to allow and encourage users to add alternative text, is that a problem?

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

Received on Monday, 19 July 2010 07:33:43 UTC