Re: response to counter proposal for ISSUE-31 AND ISSUE-80

Hi Laura,

On Jul 16, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Laura Carlson wrote:

> Contrary to its assertion, Ian's change proposal fails to require text
> alternatives for images. It fails to provide a way for automatic
> validators to programmatically detect the presence or absence of short
> text alternatives on the <img> element because of its exemptions.

Feel free to update your Change Proposal if you would like to add rationale or extend it to cover additional mechanisms. For objections, I would recommend saving those for a survey, unless you think this line of discussion can create broader consensus.

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 09:57:57 UTC