- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:11:06 +0100
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 24.02.2010 13:44, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > I support this change proposal. But I think that Julian should update > the section about positive and negative effects: > >>> 1. Positive Effects >>> >>> Documents using meta/@name="keywords" will be conforming again. > > 2) In addition they will be able to use them for specific purposes - > such as search engines inside and outside controlled environments, as > the change proposal explains. I can add that; but I'd prefer not to post an updated CP unless needed. (Chairs?). > 3) A third positive effect is that profile extensions (such as Dublin > Core) will be able to use them. HTML4 gives example of such use, and > more such use can e.g. be spotted in the examples and source code the > DC-HTML specification. Not having this option will make DC-HTML pages > invalid. Note sure about this. This issue is not about meta/@name values in general, but the value "keywords" specifically. How is that relevant to profile extensions and/or DC-HTML? > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 14:11:44 UTC