- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:12:04 -0800
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Larry, On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > I added ACTION-171 to myself to update this proposal. The chairs noted that we still do not have a proper Change Proposal on this issue. What has been submitted is scattered across multiple emails, and completely lacks Rationale. Since you submitted a partial effort, we have decided to extend the deadline for another week. At that point, if we do not have a proper Change Proposal, the issue will be closed without prejudice. The status page has been updated to reflect this: file:///Users/mjs/Work/src/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-056 Regards, Maciej > > -- > http://larry.masinter.net > > From: Larry Masinter > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:51 PM > To: 'public-html@w3.org' > Subject: Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to > normative reference to IRIBIS > > Regarding HTML working group ISSUE-56: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html should be updated, > since “Bug is still open and change has not been rejected by the > editor.” is no longer true: bug 8207 has been marked as RESOLVED > with resolution NEEDSINFO. > > Although I think the “change” section of the “Change Proposal” > itself is complete, now that Hixie’s given his reasons for rejecting > the change, the next step should be to write a Change Proposal which > actually addresses Hixie’s rejection as part of its rationale. I > think February 19 is a reasonable deadline for that, although I’ll > try to do so much sooner. > > (By the way, in a previous discussion, someone offered to date and > link to revision control version information for the issue-status > page – please do so.) > > Larry > -- > http://larry.masinter.net >
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 04:12:38 UTC