W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: requesting one more extension

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:44:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4B84221F.6070202@intertwingly.net>
To: Shelley Powers <shelleypowers@burningbird.net>
CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote:
> My apologies to the group and the co-chairs:
> I would like one more extension on the time for the change proposals for 
> issues 89, 90, 91, 92, and 98. I'd like to complete these at the same 
> time as I complete the others, on March 31st. I know the group would 
> prefer not having items handled as a lump, but some of the arguments for 
> some of the items, apply to the others, and I can't help thinking it 
> might actually be beneficial to get all of them finished at once. This 
> has worked in the past for specification edits, and can't help thinking 
> it could also work for change proposals and issues.
> Plus, I'm really pushing against my book deadline, and am concerned now 
> I'll miss it -- something that's not helped by me getting sick.
> I also volunteer, before you even ask the group, to write a change 
> proposal for ISSUE-100, which could also apply to issue 103. I'd finish 
> it at the same time, March 31. In fact, I'm going to try to have all my 
> concerns written in change proposal format by March 31, even if the text 
> is entered into a bug rather than written as part of a change proposal. 
> I figured if it does become an issue and change proposal, the work is 
> done ahead of time.
> I appreciate the group and the co-chairs consideration of this request.

I've updated http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html

I've made the assumption that you meant 95 instead of 98.  If you did 
not mean to include 95 in your list, let me know, and I will revert that 
date back to March 8.

> Shelley

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:45:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:58 UTC