- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:44:47 -0500
- To: Shelley Powers <shelleypowers@burningbird.net>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote: > My apologies to the group and the co-chairs: > > I would like one more extension on the time for the change proposals for > issues 89, 90, 91, 92, and 98. I'd like to complete these at the same > time as I complete the others, on March 31st. I know the group would > prefer not having items handled as a lump, but some of the arguments for > some of the items, apply to the others, and I can't help thinking it > might actually be beneficial to get all of them finished at once. This > has worked in the past for specification edits, and can't help thinking > it could also work for change proposals and issues. > > Plus, I'm really pushing against my book deadline, and am concerned now > I'll miss it -- something that's not helped by me getting sick. > > I also volunteer, before you even ask the group, to write a change > proposal for ISSUE-100, which could also apply to issue 103. I'd finish > it at the same time, March 31. In fact, I'm going to try to have all my > concerns written in change proposal format by March 31, even if the text > is entered into a bug rather than written as part of a change proposal. > I figured if it does become an issue and change proposal, the work is > done ahead of time. > > I appreciate the group and the co-chairs consideration of this request. I've updated http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html I've made the assumption that you meant 95 instead of 98. If you did not mean to include 95 in your list, let me know, and I will revert that date back to March 8. > Shelley - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:45:20 UTC