- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:12:11 +0100
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "HTMLwg WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:44:37 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/LongdescConformingWithWarning > I personally do not think the case for longdesc is terribly compelling. > I wanted to write this proposal so we have a middle-ground position on > the table, that is a compromise between fully noncomforming and fully > conforming. We can examine whether that middle ground satisfies more > people than either of the extremes. If it cannot draw more support than > either of the previous proposals then I will likely withdraw it. Unlike Hixie's proposal, I think that this proposal can turn into something I can support. I don't think the statement in the Wiki that longdesc must refer to an external page is accurate, and I would in any case change my change proposal to explicitly allow for longdesc references to be within the page (my understanding is that this is already allowed). I do consider that in the long term longdesc should be phased out in favour of a more generalised solution to the problem it solves - something like aria-describedBy, but with a better way of handling descriptions that *are* external references. >> The second argument in the change proposal is: >> >> "Some laws, regulations and organizational policies may refer to >> longdesc by name." >> >> Using this as argument for keeping any feature seems very sad to me. >> The idealist in me strongly prefers to add accessibility features >> based on what helps people with accessibility needs, rather than what >> local laws say. It is not axiomatic that laws, regulations and organisational policies are wrong. Many things done for accessibility begin as one of those things. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 14:12:53 UTC