Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile

On 21.02.2010 09:42, Tantek Celik wrote:
> Indeed I have no intent to expand the functionality of the profile attribute beyond what is minimally needed for locally scoped follow-your-nose functionality for microformats (class and rel effectively, rev being deprecated), RDFa, and potentially microdata as well.

I think we need to include DC-HTML, and eRDF.

> In short, nothing for meta name (invisible data antipattern), and nothing for data-* which is not intended for use as shared vocabulary (as far as I can tell from reading the spec).

...which *does* mean that meta/@name needs to be included.

I understand the antipattern argument, but that's orthogonal to the 
definition of @profile.

I agree with the part about data-*.

> ...

Best regards, Julian

Received on Sunday, 21 February 2010 08:53:25 UTC