Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails from Julian Reschke on 2010-02-18 (public-html@w3.org from February 2010)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:21:12 +0100
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4B7D3EC8.9020509@gmx.de>

On 18.02.2010 13:04, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:45:20 +0100, Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> - although being absolute according to common sense, *not* to be an
>> "absolute URL".
>
> If it's not a valid URL, why would it be an absolute URL?

It's an URL (*) that is absolute, so why isn't it an "absolute URL"?

Best regards, Julian

(*) URLs in HTML5 are not necessarily valid. I didn't invent that 
terminology.

Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 13:21:52 UTC