- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:17:33 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Feb 17, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 17.02.2010 16:30, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> .. >> It's possible that we could define a new method for @ping, call it >> PING. It would still be "unsafe", that is, not idempotent, by >> definition. I'm not sure what possible benefits this could bring >> over >> just using POST, though. >> ... > > "safe" and "idempotent" are different things. Aren't all "safe" methods also "idempotent" by definition? Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:18:06 UTC