- From: Martin Kliehm <martin.kliehm@namics.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:20:56 +0100
- To: W3C HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
On 17.02.2010 12:32, Sam Ruby wrote: > The rules for a Formal Objection can be found here: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#WGArchiveMinorityViews > > An individual who registers a Formal Objection SHOULD cite technical > arguments and propose changes that would remove the Formal > Objection; these proposals MAY be vague or incomplete. Formal > Objections that do not provide substantive arguments or rationale > are unlikely to receive serious consideration by the Director. > > At the present time, I don't see any specific, substantive actionable > technical arguments in this part of your objection. That being said, I > am quite willing to participate in the forwarding of this objection to > the Director, and encourage you to provide more specifics. I fear that > until or unless this is done, your Formal Objection will not be met with > serious consideration until it has be augmented with substantiative > details on what exactly needs to be fixed. I appreciate your efforts to convince me and also the linking of the relevant documents. I was familiar with them at the time of my writing, and I know that it's your right to deem my objections insubstantive or insufficient and proceed without consideration. I still think they are substantial. But it's fine that we disagree, and I have no bad feelings about it. ;) Cheers, Martin
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 14:21:26 UTC