Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4)

On Feb 17, 2010, at 15:25, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:

> 	http://www.må
> It is a valid HTML4 page, with a strict DOCTYPE.

No, it's a page that contains the HTML 4.01 Strict public id.

It doesn't use *the* HTML 4.01 Strict doctype. The HTML 4.01 Strict doctype doesn't use the internal subset syntax.

It also doesn't make sense to claim that a page that uses the internal subset is "valid HTML4", since you could inject pretty much anything via the internal subset.

Henri Sivonen

Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 13:34:05 UTC