Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals

On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:55:10 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> - One of the reasons it may not have been raised is that link relation  
> types do not *need* to be registered; you can always use a URI you  
> control (that would address the vendor namespace, for instance).

To be frank, only a few would mint URLs. The rest will keep continue doing  
what they always did, and rightly so. Using URLs as rel values would be  
extremely cumbersome.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 13:00:38 UTC