- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:59:44 +0100
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:55:10 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > - One of the reasons it may not have been raised is that link relation > types do not *need* to be registered; you can always use a URI you > control (that would address the vendor namespace, for instance). To be frank, only a few would mint URLs. The rest will keep continue doing what they always did, and rightly so. Using URLs as rel values would be extremely cumbersome. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 13:00:38 UTC