- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:40:33 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Feb 15, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> Ian Hickson wrote: >>> Here's a counter-proposal for ISSUE-30: >> >> Thanks! I've updated http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html >> >> Potential next steps: >> >> 0. Amicable Resolution >> 3. Discussion >> 4. Call for Consensus >> 6. Poll or Vote > > Even though it's a day past the deadline, I'd like to request an extra > week to write up a third alternate proposal. My alternative would > propose making the longdesc attribute conforming, but with a mandatory > validator warning. Sam and/or Paul, can you please advise whether this > would be acceptable? I've updated issue-status to reflect that the next step is on you, with a date of 22 Feb. > Regards, > Maciej - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 22:41:06 UTC