- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 03:31:57 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> Out of curiosity, for a document like: >> >> <!DOCTYPE html> >> <html> >> <head><title>...</title></head> >> <body> >> <img src="myPic.jpg"> >> <img src="myPic.jpg"> >> </body> >> </html> >> >> and with a GET request to myPic.jpg returning cache-control:no-cache >> >> Should this result in two requests being made to myPic.jpg? If not, is > > No. > >> that considered ignoring HTTP caching rules? > > It depends on what HTML says about how the <img> tag is processed. How does it depend on what HTML says? I.e. under what conditions would HTML requiring your "No" answer above be violating the HTTP caching rules? And under what conditions would requiring your "No" answer not violate the HTTP caching rules? Or am I misunderstanding your answer? / Jonas
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 11:32:50 UTC