Jonas Sicking wrote: > ... > Alternatively, any time we have a WG decision to create a split, tie > that decision to a FPWD publishing decision for the split out part. I > believe Manu's change proposal at some point contained such language, > but he was convinced to remove it unfortunately. > ... I agree with that. If a split is about modularity (2d canvas?), not scope (Microdata), then it probably should be coupled with a decision to FPWD the new spec. Best regards, JulianReceived on Friday, 12 February 2010 22:20:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:10 UTC