- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:23:32 -0500
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com > <mailto:mjs@apple.com>> wrote: > > > On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:06 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com >> <mailto:mjs@apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Shelley Powers wrote: >> >>> >>> Frankly, according to Sam's recent email in this thread about >>> the issue tracker and the procedure[3], once the issues I'm >>> writing Change Proposals for are properly upgraded to Open >>> issues, I'm blocking HTML5 more than Adobe, or any other >>> company: I have more issues in the issue tracker, all of >>> which, if I understand the process, are blocking until resolved. >> >> As far as I'm concerned, raising issues in accordance with the >> process is not "blocking HTML5". It is an attempt to improve >> HTML5 (though of course others may disagree on what >> constitutes an improvement). I hope that is how you see it as >> well. >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >> >> >> I agree. I see all of my bugs, issues, and change proposals as an >> attempt to improve or correct the HTM5 specification, and nothing >> more. >> >> I don't want to speak for others, but I would imagine this is the >> reason anyone brings up these concerns--and file bugs, raise >> issues, and write change proposals. The word "blocking" can be >> misinterpreted so easily. >> >> But I'm not sure what I should do now when it comes to switching >> my issues from RAISED to OPEN, and to sync them with the HTML5 >> spec? Should I try the issue edits myself? Or do I need to wait >> for someone else to do the work? I'm wiling to do the work, and >> decipher the code necessary to make the connections, but if you >> all would rather I not, I'm just as happy for someone else to do >> the work -- as long as it gets done. > > It's best to add the status codes yourself if you can figure it out. > And it's fine to put your own issues in OPEN state (I will do it > myself when I get a chance if it's not done when I get around to > looking.) > > Regards, > Maciej > > Cool. Will do tonight then. I guess I didn't check email fast enough. I've moved 81, 84, and 89-97 to OPEN. > Thanks! > > Shelley - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 20:24:15 UTC